Skip to main content

Salvator Mundi Puts Leonardo in the Headlines




Leonardo's most cryptic and virtually unknown work, Salvator Mundi sold for a mind-boggling $450 million dollars at Christie's New York to break a world record, more than paying for the painstaking restoration by the incredibly skilled hands of Dianne Dwyer Modestini. Read more about her process in this CNN article. This article by Gary Meisner talks about Da Vinci's use of Golden Ration proportions within the painting.

Although this kind of selling price has outraged many art critics and skeptics alike all over the world—how dare an Old Master work outsell a Van Gogh or other modern work? I'll leave the art market talk to the experts. In this post I hope to examine the painting more fully and explore how much of it is the hand of Leonardo and the rest possibly the hand of others including Melzi, among others. Am I disputing its authorship? Not necessarily. I have profound respect for Professor Martin Kemp and I'm sure he's right when he says that standing before this painting you get the chills, like in all of Leonardo's work. What I will explore here is the proposed date of this painting and some of its details and characteristics that are both indicative of and lacking in what is a textbook Leonardo.


First off, let's take a closer look:

Leonardo da Vinci, Salvator Mundi, c.1500, oil on walnut, 45.4 × 65.6 cm
Salvator Mundi, ca. 1500?


What is most peculiar about the painting is the frontal view. Leonardo always painted his portraits in 3/4 view or profile, but never in this direct view looking directly at the viewer. We can argue that Leonardo consciously chose this view of Christ as not only the Saviour of the World but by his cryptic gaze, as the judge of humanity also thus, not a mere portrait but representing the Divine. While many are taking at length about the transparent crystal sphere as being too transparent, as a painter I am more interested in the rest of the details. The face and hand—specifically his right hand giving the benediction—are undoubtedly by Leonardo. Even with the pentimento on the thumb, the way the soft light falls on the hand is clearly his characteristic chiaroscuro at work. Christ's face here, confident and unflinching, is a direct contrast to the Christ he painted between 1495-1498 of the Last Supper, where Jesus is pensive and gazes with downcast eyes to the table below.. Leonardo deliberately made the face, especially the eyes, partially unfinished to heighten the drama of the hypnotic gaze. Using the black background was a common element however, in his male portraits:

Leonardo da Vinci - Portrait of a Musician
portrait of unknown musician, ca.1490


Saint John the Baptist, 1516



The ornate Renaissance pattern in the x-shape across his chest definitely has the eye of Leonardo in that incredible detail:





Where I do have issue with the painting is in the drapery itself. If you look at Christ's right hand and the way he executed the drapery hanging gracefully from his wrist, the attention to detail here is definitely Leonardo. However, look at the left hand holding the crystal orb and the drapery surrounding it, including the chest area and one can readily see the brushstrokes are different. The way the drapery is depicted here is frankly amateurish, not up to Leonardo's exacting standards. Look at these studies from Leonardo supposedly that reveal how he was going to incorporate all the chest and sleeves in the confines of the composition:


Gewandstudie Salvator Mundi da Vinci 2
A study of drapery for a Salvator Mundi, Red chalk with pen and ink and white heightening on pale red prepared paper, ca. 1508


It is quite evident here that Leonardo planned for the painting to be much longer than the final version we know of. So this begs the question then, that why would the right hand side of the painting look wrong? Even the blue pigment used is different than that of the rest of the painting:



My only conclusion is that either Leonardo abandoned the painting for whatever reason: declining eye sight, , poor health, etc and another hand finished the left shoulder area. Why it is dated at 1500 is strange because of Saint John the Baptist is clearly a much later work that shows no retouching or any other hand on it. Nonetheless, the restoration is amazing truly, and the work is an important discovery that merits attention.

Popular posts from this blog

More Old Master Drawings

There is nothing in all the world more beautiful or significant of the laws of the universe than the nude human body.
Robert Henri








Charles Louis Müller, A Standing Female Nude Leaning Against an Arch, ca.1864

Once again I decided to talk about some Old Master drawings and delve into the thinking behind how these drawings may have been created and the knowledge of the artist. In the above drawing by Müller, done in sanguine with white chalk highlights, the figure is drawn from a low view-point, with her body twisting toward her left side while resting on one knee. Note how Müller alternates the bent right leg with the bent left arm to create dynamic contrast. The right arm is also foreshortened and partially in shadow. Expressing power and femininity, this is a study that is Renaissance in spirit, even Mannerist, revealing the female nude as sculptural yet always graceful.







Anton Raphael Mengs, Seated male nude viewed from the back, 1755

One of several Academic nude studies by Mengs, this …

Guercino il Magnifico

Self-Portrait of the Artist holding a Palette, ca.1635


Giovanni Francesco Barbieri, known as Guercino was born on February 8, 1591 in Cento, a small city near Ferrara. He is one of the great masters of the Italian Baroque and poet of painters. Noted for his speed and efficiency, Guercino also worked in a number of mediums with equal passion whether ink, chalk, charcoal, or oils. His nickname, which means 'little cross-eyes' in Italian, derives in part from an apocryphal childhood accident where he supposedly awoke from a deep sleep as a child from a loud scream that caused his eyes to cross. Another story says something was thrown into his eyes. At any rate, he was self-taught as an artist from as early as nine years old and by his early teens was discovered by the eldest of the Carracci where he would spend some time at the Accademia Degli Incamminati before venturing out on his own. Despite his apparent 'handicap', his vision and talent would make him a giant that few…

Pompeo Batoni

Apollo and two Muses, 1719

Giant of the Rococo and early Neoclassicism, Pompeo Batoni was born on January 25, 1708 in Lucca, Italy. Immensely popular in his time, his name sadly is not commonly recognized today because like many Old Masters, his work is not defined by one or two singular masterpieces but by an oeuvre that is overall, incredible. Batoni is something of an anomaly in that he had the midas touch in every genre he worked in, whether portraiture, mythological, and biblical. He trained under a few painters, notably Sebastiano Conca yet he quickly fused his own style together by reinterpreting Classicism with his own vigor for dynamic posing, color and anatomy that he felt was lacking in many artists of the Rococo. His reputation as a portraitist in Rome was highly successful, particularly for many British patrons of the Grand Tour who had heard of Batoni by word of mouth and sought his genius.

In Apollo and two Muses above Batoni seems to conjure mythology and Classicism w…